Website URL: E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Kansas may be coming off a 1-11 season, but there is plenty to like about what KU's offense will trot out onto the field when they open the season September 7th against South Dakota.
Much of that optimism is based on quarterback Jake Heaps, yes, but KU may have picked up another important piece with the announcement that Miami (OH) wide receiver Nick Harwell will transfer to play for Kansas and head coach, Charlie Weis.
Of course KU fans can get too excited just yet. Harwell still has to graduate from Miami this spring in order for him to be eligible for the 2013 season, otherwise, he would have to sit out this season to satisfy transfer rules. According to Kansas officials in Matt Tait's article for the Lawrence Journal-World, “Nick Harwell’s eligibility is to be determined as the Compliance and Academic staff work through the process.”
During his three seasons at Miami, Harwell hauled in 23 touchdown passes and racked up over 3,000 yards receiving in the process. He led the MAC in receiving last season with 68 catches for 870 yards despite missing three games with a knee injury.
If is indeed eligible next season, he would help fill a huge void for an offense that struggled to move the ball through the air last season. The Jayhawks finished last in the Big 12 in total offense largely because Kansas averaged just 148 yards per game passing. Dayne Crist's inconsistencies at the position didn't help matters, but Kansas was also without a big play threat at the receiver position.
Harwell's addition to go along with Heaps, Tony Pierson (who's expected to spend a lot of time in the slot), and running back James Sims, would provide a dramatic improvement in the Jayhawk's talent at the skill positions.
That might not be saying much for a team that averaged just 18 points a game last season, but things certainly appear to be trending in the right direction.
The Football Bowl Association released the 2013-14 bowl schedule for the upcoming season on Wednesday. Not that you weren’t already doing it, but prepare yourself to say sayonara to the BCS.
This will be the last season the BCS decides college football’s national champion with the upcoming College Football playoff set to begin following the 2014 season. With it will come a whole slew different bowl games for conferences as they shuffle - in some cases - long standing bowl agreements as they attempt better accommodate their conferences’ teams.
But for one more season, we get the BCS and the usual bowl tie-ins we’ve become accustomed too. For the Big 12, this year’s bowl line up will mirror what it has been the last several seasons.
The only difference from last year is that the Heart of Dallas Bowl will match a Big Ten team vs. a team from C-USA instead of a team from the Big 12 since it will be an even numbered year. Everything else remains status quo.
Here’s a look at the dates for the Big 12’s bowl games for the upcoming season.
| Date | Time (CST) | Bowl Game | Matchup | TV |
| Fri, 12/27 | 5:00 | Texas Bowl | B1G vs. Big 12 | ESPN |
| Sat, 12/28 | 11:00 | New Era Pinstripe | American vs. Big 12 | ESPN |
| Sat, 12/28 | 9:15 | Buffalo Wild Wings | B1G vs. Big 12 | ESPN |
| Mon, 12/30 | 5:45 | Valero Alamo Bowl | Pac-12 vs. Big 12 | ESPN |
| Mon, 12/30 | 9:15 | Holiday Bowl | Pac-12 vs. Big 12 | ESPN |
| Wed, 1/1 | 7:30 | Fiesta Bowl | BCS vs. BCS/Big 12 #1 | ESPN |
| Fri, 1/3 | 6:30 | AT&T Cotton Bowl | SEC vs. Big 12 | Fox |
One great aspect of the Big 12’s bowl lineup continues to be there is not one game that overlaps another which is perfect for the fans that like to keep an eye on other teams in the conference. The same can’t be said for the Big Ten which likes to jam as many of their conferences games into the same day (and time), even if it is New Year’s Day.
Like previous seasons, the Cotton Bowl will get the conference’s first selection after the BCS (likely the Fiesta) takes the Big 12 champion, assuming they’re not playing in the title game. Then the Alamo gets to make their selection followed by the Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl, Holiday Bowl, Texas Bowl, and the New Era Pinstripe.
The new bowl agreements that will take effect for the 2014 season are expected to be announced in early June.
The Big Ten released its 2014 football schedule on Wednesday. For Nebraska, there were the expected division games against the new B1G west teams along with cross division games against Michigan State and Rutgers.
Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State were nowhere to be found, which depending on your point of view, can be both a positive and a negative.
Here’s a look at who the Huskers will be matching up with in the first year of the Big Ten’s new 14 team conference along with a few thoughts to follow.
Nebraska 2014 Schedule
Aug. 30 Florida Atlantic
Sept. 6 McNeese State
Sept. 13 at Fresno State
Sept. 20 Miami, Fla.
Sept. 27 Illinois
Oct. 4 at Michigan State
Oct. 11 BYE
Oct. 18 at Northwestern
Oct. 25 Rutgers
Nov. 1 Purdue
Nov. 8 BYE
Nov. 15 at Wisconsin
Nov. 22 Minnesota
Nov. 28 (Fri.) at Iowa
The good: Winning all of your games is better than losing, right? That’s not to say Nebraska’s schedule sets up for an undefeated season necessarily, but it certainly will be much easier to accomplish by avoiding Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State during the regular season.
The bad: With a selection committee set to decide the four teams that make the new College Football playoff in 2014, how would the committee view an unbalanced conference schedule? That’s anybody’s guess, but if strength of schedule is truly going to be a major component of the decision process, Nebraska’s 2014 schedule certainly won’t do them any favors should they put themselves in that position. In such a scenario, the Huskers would have to hang their hat on a road win at Wisconsin and a victory against the east division champion in the B1G title game.
The good: Nebraska gets a bye week before two of their tougher road games, at Northwestern and Wisconsin.
The bad: The home schedule is void of any marquee matchups. It’ll be cool having Miami visit Lincoln, but this is certainly the same Hurricane program we used to know. Who knows how good they’ll be in two years, but they visited Kansas State last season and lost by 39.
The good: Nebraska doesn’t play on the road in consecutive weeks all season. They’ll play Northwestern and Michigan State on the road in back-to-back games, but the games are separated by the first bye week of the season.
The bad: Nebraska gets Rutgers at home in one of their two cross division matchups. That game just oozes Big Ten rivalry, or something.
The good: Nebraska gets Illinois, Rutgers, Purdue, and Minnesota as its home Big Ten games.
The bad: Nebraska gets Illinois, Rutgers, Purdue, and Minnesota as its home Big Ten games. It feels a lot like Iowa State, Kansas, Missouri, and Kansas State back in the day minus the history.
The good: Nebraska maintains is needed seven game home schedule.
The bad: Two of the nonconference matchups are against Florida Atlantic (coached by brother Carl) and FCS member McNeese State.
The good: If you were handpicking a schedule in a year after you lose a four-year starter at quarterback, this might be the one.
The bad: The Huskers toughest Big Ten games of the season are all on the road, at Michigan State, Northwestern, Wisconsin and Iowa.
So what do you think? All-in-all, not a lot to get excited about as far as marquee national games go. But then again, winning is what most fans care about and the Big Ten certainly laid out a schedule that should be full of those.
Wes Lunt's career at Oklahoma State is over before it really got started.
On one hand, Lunt deciding to transfer from Oklahoma State is absolutely surprising. How many quarterbacks graduate high school early, leave home to attend spring football practice and win the starting quarterback job only months after stepping foot on campus? Not many, especially at a place like Oklahoma State where the offense is so predicated on strong quarterback play..
On the flip side, it's never going to be easy keeping three capable quarterbacks happy. Only one guy can play which means two guys are standing on the sidelines getting really good at hand signals.
Lunt was the guy on the field to start last season and now he's gone. Who knows what the situation would be had Lunt stayed healthy all season. He injured his knee in the third game of the season only to come back a month later and sustain a concussion essentially ending his freshman season.
His injuries allowed J.W Walsh and Clint Chelf to show what they could do which, by the way, wasn't good enough in practice apparently. But Walsh and Chelf both had plenty of success when they got their chance which put the Cowboys quarterback situation in a bit of murky water.
Head coach Mike Gundy said Chelf was the number one guy heading into spring practice but following 15 practices, the job may or may not have reopened. Gundy wasn't talking other than to say the competition for the starting job would continue into fall camp.
The only thing we know for sure at this point is the starter won't be Wes Lunt. Did he see the writing on the wall? Maybe, but I doubt it. Had Chelf indeed played this coming season, Lunt could have redshirted and still had three years left to play. He would have had to beat out Walsh next season, but he's already done it once so there's no reason to think he couldn't do it again.
Was he just plain unhappy in Stillwater? Maybe, but from most accounts that didn't seem to be the case. We will probably never know the truth on that front.
The only thing that sticks out at this point in which we can try to draw conclusions from is the fact his offensive coordinator, Todd Monken, is now the head coach at Southern Miss. He won the job last spring and I'm sure Monken had a big say in that decision. With Monken's departure, maybe Gundy or new offensive coordinator, Mike Yurcich, didn't see the situation the same.
After all, the offense wasn't going to change. Yurcich has spent the bulk of his time since arriving on campus learning the Cowboys playbook initially installed by Dana Holgorsen. The only thing that has changed is the guy calling the plays.
Lunt's departure won't spell any doom and gloom at the position this season assuming they don't get hit with the rash of injuries they suffered last season. The offense is still in good hands with Chelf or Walsh running the show. Where the Cowboys may begin to feel the sting of his departure is in 2014 when Walsh and Arizona transfer Daxx Garman are left to battle for the job.
Of course, there's still plenty of time for Oklahoma State to fill the vacancy through recruiting or picking up a transfer of their own.
All we know is that Lunt will be wearing a different jersey when and if he see's the field again. It's funny how fast these things change sometimes. One second he looks like the future of the program and the next he's searching for a new home.
On Wednesday, USA Today released their compilation of athletic department revenue for all the public universities across the country. It's not exactly shocking news to see that Texas continues to lead the country in revenue by over $20 million.
The Longhorns raked in over $163 million of revenue in 2012 which netted a profit of $25 million. The Longhorns top line was nearly three times that of Iowa State who generated the smallest revenue in the Big 12 (it should be noted that since Baylor and TCU are private schools, they are not required to make their financial information public).
Texas has the biggest stadium in the Big 12, they receive the highest amount of donations, and haul in far more rights licensing fees than any other school in the league (or country for that matter), or in other words, it's good to be Texas.
Here's a look at where the eight of 10 Big 12 teams finished the 2012 fiscal year.
Big 12 Finances, 2012
| Nat'l Rank | School | Revenue | Expenses | Net Profit |
| 1 | Texas | $163,295,115 | $138,269,710 | $25,025,405 |
| 9 | Oklahoma | $106,456,616 | $96,250,328 | $10,206,288 |
| 22 | Oklahoma State | $87,270,598 | $96,782,619 | -$9,512,021 |
| 28 | West Virginia | $80,064,869 | $92,968,960 | -$12,904,091 |
| 36 | Kansas | $70,228,913 | $78,973,441 | -$8,744,528 |
| 40 | Texas Tech | $67,928,350 | $60,346,836 | $7,581,514 |
| 43 | Kansas State | $63,271,615 | $50,994,785 | $12,276,830 |
| 50 | Iowa State | $55,151,017 | $55,113,720 |
$37,297 |
Only two schools in the Big 12 generated a loss within their athetic department last year, Oklahoma State and West Virginia. It appears as if the Mountaineers found out switching conferences can be a rather expensive endeavor even if it's in the short term.
I have no idea of the situation at Oklahoma State other than to say the category listed as "other" within their expenses was significantly higher than it has been in years past. I'm guessing that might have been some kind of one time expense known in the accounting world as an "extraordinary item" that caused the loss, but that is nothing more than a wild guess.
Digging a little deeper into the numbers, it's no secret that when you generate more revenue, the more you can spend. Texas spent far more for it's coaching staff than any school in the country.
The Longhorns paid their coaches approximately $53 million in 2012. Ohio State, which was second in overall revenue, paid their coaches $31 million, Michigan, $39 million and Alabama, $39 million.
There's no breakdown of coaching salaries by sport, but does anyone think Texas might just be overpaying for it's coaching staffs? I guess working at Texas is a pretty sweet gig as far as compensation goes. If you've got the money, you might as well spend it especially since UT still generated a profit of more than $25 million.
Here's a breakdown of what the Big 12 schools spent for their coaching staffs in 2012.
Big 12 Combined Coaching Salaries
| School | Coaching Staff Expense |
| Texas | $53,525,850 |
| Oklahoma | $36,408,691 |
| Kansas | $28,571,585 |
| Oklahoma State | $24,909,273 |
| West Virginia | $24,342,899 |
| Texas Tech | $22,238,462 |
| Kansas State | $19,459,207 |
| Iowa State | $17,588,341 |
All in all, there wasn't any big surprises in the overall numbers. The big schools keep printing dollar bills and everyone else keeps chugging along while most continue to generate a profit. I'm guessing they have the TV networks to thank for that.
Count former Texas Tech coach Tommy Tuberville as one who was surprised when West Virginia joined the Big 12 getting the conference back to 10 members following Missouri's defection to the SEC.
Dennis Dodd at CBS Sports had a good interview with Tuberville who has never been shy about sharing his thoughts on expansion or the Big 12's need for a championship game.
“They [Big 12] made a great choice in (inviting) TCU. Gary's (Patterson) a good coach. Then from left field here comes West Virginia and we're all going, ‘What?' Football's not bad [for travel] but in basketball and all the other sports you're going, ‘What is West Virginia thinking?' “
Well, it's not secret what West Virginia was thinking. They were sitting in the Big East which was disintegrating right before their eyes and were on the verge of being on the outside looking in.
The Big 12 offered a place to call home and one where they were going to bring in significantly more money than they had been making in the Big East. It also offered them a spot in a conference that was going to be a major player in the new college football playoff which will start following the 2014 season
The extra travel was a definite downside to the move but considering the alternatives at the time, it was a small price to pay to have a seat at the big boy's table for the foreseeable future.
Tuberville also offered some insight into what he was thinking when the Big 12 was on the verge of collapse. Even though it wasn't that long ago, it's easy to forget what a tumultuous time it was for the Big 12.
“At Tech we didn't know. For about 48 hours at one time, we were going to the Pac-12, I thought. I thought it was done. … Then the next year A&M gets pissed and they're gone. And Missouri takes the money and runs. Now what are we going to do? We can't be the Big Eight."
All that is now ancient history with conference expansion coming to a screeching halt with the ACC's grant of rights deal and Tuberville now finds himself at Cincinnati, one of the former Big East schools outside of the five remaining major conferences.
Instead of butting heads with Texas and Oklahoma, he'll now be prepping for games with Houston, South Florida and the likes of East Carolina, Tulane, and Tulsa starting in 2014. But he knew what he was getting into when he took the job at Cincinnati, or he at least had to know there was a definite possibility that they would find themselves in their current situation.
It's still a bit of a head scratching move, but then again, he probably saw the writing on the wall in Lubbock and got out while it was still his choice to do so.
Who knows, maybe he intends to parlay the Cincy job into something better back in the SEC, something that some thought he was trying to do by taking the Texas Tech job. If that was intent, well, things didn't go so well.
If he couldn't get it done in Lubbock, it certainly isn't going to any easier in his new gig as the gap continues to widens between that haves and have-nots in college football and right now Cincinnati looks to be the latter.
Replacing quarterback Collin Klein is no small task at Kansas State. Klein accounted for roughly 69% of the Wildcats offense over the past two seasons not to mention 79 touchdowns. And more importantly, he led K-State to 21 wins over the span which included a Big 12 championship last season.
The candidates to replace him include redshirt sophomore Daniel Sams who was Klein's backup a season ago and junior college transfer Jake Waters. Waters is fresh off leading Iowa Western to the junior college national championship last season.
Both look like the type of quarterback that fits perfectly into Kansas State's offensive system. Sams is probably the better runner, although based on what he showed in last Saturday's spring game, Waters is more than mobile enough to pick up yards on the ground. He also appears to be the more accurate passer of the two.
“Unlike anyone we have seen, he puts the ball in different spots,” KSU wide receiver Curry Sexton said. “If there is a tight window in a certain route where a guy looks like he is covered, somehow he fits it in there. He has that ‘wow’ factor more than what we’ve seen in the past.”
With the talent and tools that seem to mirror each other, whoever wins the job will likely be the guy who is most comfortable running the offense which usually leads to making the fewest mistakes. One thing is for certain, the quickest way to find yourself standing next to Snyder on the sideline is by turning the ball over.
Kansas State is +31 in turnover margin the last two seasons. They turned the ball over only 27 times which is fewer than any other team in the Big 12 over that time. Some consider Bill Snyder to be some sort of wizard for winning football game with inferior talent, but there's really not much magic involved in it. Make fewer mistakes than your opponent and you've given yourself a good chance win a football game.
That's where Sams might have the slight upper hand. He's been on campus for two seasons and has had the opportunity to watch and learn how Klein goes about his business. But that doesn't ensure he won't make mistakes when the lights come on for real. He has only played in one game over the past two seasons that wasn't already decided. The simple fact is, you don't know for sure how he'll respond when and if he becomes the guy to lead KSU's offense.
There's also plenty to like about Waters, but it's nearly impossible to predict how a guy makes the transition from the junior college ranks. What Waters has shown to this point is that he's more than capable of being a very good Big 12 quarterback, but blowing up the K-State's second team defense in the spring game is one thing, doing it against Oklahoma, Texas, or TCU is another.
So no, replacing Klein isn't an easy chore, but Snyder looks to have two good options to attempt to do just that. Who ends up getting the first crack at it - not even Snyder probably knows at this point - will have plenty of expectations to live up to.
Whoever wins the job will be working behind one of the best offensive lines in the league to go along with an experienced running back in John Hubert and he'll have the luxury of throwing to one of the most exciting players in the Big 12 in Tyler Lockett.
If I had to put my money on somebody right now, I'd go with Waters starting the opener against North Dakota State and that's not to take anything away from Sams. There's a lot of upside with either guy and remember, nobody could have predicted - or for that matter expected - Klein would have accomplished what he did in Manhattan.
He far exceeded anybody's expectations and now that he's finally moved on, the cupboard isn't exactly bare although we won't know that for sure until sometime this fall. But here's guessing Snyder will find the right man for the job and the there won't be the near the drop off in Manhattan that some are predicting. The guy happens to have a pretty salty track record when it comes to these sort of things.
Junior Paul Millard and redshirt freshman Ford Childress spent the spring in Morgantown fighting for the starting quarterback job at West Virginia. As expected, that battle will continue into fall camp with neither quarterback gaining a sizeable lead in the race throughout spring camp.
That race will have a new participant when practice resumes this fall with Wednesday's announcement that former Florida State quarterback, Clint Trickett, has officially announced his intention to transfer to West Virginia in hopes of earning the starting quarterback job.
Trickett will graduate from Florida State this spring meaning he'll be eligible to play this fall with two years of eligibility still remaining.
At a minimum, his foray into WVU's quarterback competition gives Dana Holgorsen an insurance card should Millard or Childress fail to prove their capable of being the trigger man in Holgorsen's offense which depends entirely on efficient quarterback play.
With Geno Smith talking the bulk of snaps over the past three seasons, Millard's opportunity for playing time have been almost nonexistence since arriving on campus in 2011. Childress has plenty of potential but has yet to take a collegiate snap after redshirting last season.
Enter Trickett who has more game experience than either of his competitors having started two games in Tallahassee which included an impressive performance against Clemson in 2011. Since then, however, he's been mostly relegated to mop up duty backing up starter E. J. Manuel who was the only quarterback selected in the first round of this year's NFL draft.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out why Trickett chose West Virginia over Auburn and South Florida. Holgorsen's offensive system combined with the fact there is no incumbent starter returning more than likely made it an easy choice for Trickett. Not to mention, he spent time growing up in Morgantown while his dad, Rick Trickett, served as WVU's offensive line coach from 2001-2006.
Can he run Holgorsen's system with the same type of success that Case Keenum, Brandon Weeden, and Smith had before him?
He'll have plenty to prove over the summer and throughout fall camp, but here's guessing Holgorsen is excited to have another option to lead the Mountaineers as they enter their second season in the Big 12.
There was plenty of talk during Mike Gundy's most recent flirtation with Tennessee about the Cowboy's scheduling philosophy. If there is indeed still a feud between Gundy and athletic director Mike Holder (or ever was one), I guess you can chalk one up for the AD with the Cowboy's announcing a future home and home series with Boise State.
The Broncos will play in Stillwater in 2018 with OSU's return trip to Boise scheduled in 2021.
As you know, Gundy isn't a big fan of playing strong out of conference opponents while atheltic director Mike Holder sees some benefit ($$) in putting at one strong opponent on the schedule from time to time.
Oklahoma State opens the upcoming season by playing Mississippi State in Houston and will open the 2014 season by playing Florida State at Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, both at which Gundy reportedly balked at.
It's possible, however, Gundy is just changing his tune a bit with the upcoming College Football Playoff set to get started following the 2014 season.
Strength of schedule is expected to be a component of the selection process and given the fact the Big 12, as it stands now, is without a championship games, adding a strong out of conference opponent will do nothing but help their resume. The selection committee might not exactly be impressed with too many more 84-0 victories over Savannah State.
As for the fans, it's a win-win all the way around.
I've never understood the theory in softening a schedule to the point where it's downright embarassing. Sure, you don't want to load the schedule with power house teams every season, but playing good teams should only make your own team better, in theory at least. And besides, if your team is good enough to play for a national title, it'll win those games. If it's not, it won't and it doesn't do anyone any good to wait until the title game to find that out.
Of course, by the time these two teams actually meet -five and eight years away - who knows what the playoff picture will look like. It's only going to get bigger, if anything, and losing a nonconference game against a worthy opponent isn't likely to knock a team out of picture given they run the table during the conference season.
Oklahoma captured its eight Big 12 championship last season and they now have the rings to prove it according to the OU equipment team's twitter feed.
The picture is a little blurry, but it appears as if they decided to leave the Co-champion off the part where it says Big 12 champions.
Big 12 Football Championship rings are finally here! @fat_daddy33 @brennanclay24 @soonersportscom @soonerfootball twitter.com/ouequipment/st…
— OU Equipment (@ouequipment) April 24, 2013
If you remember, Oklahoma split the Big 12 title last season with Kansas State who also finished with an 8-1 conference record.
That fact they didn't include "Co-champions" on the rings isn't meant in the least as a bash against Oklahoma for claiming the title despite their loss to Kansas State when they met head-to head in Norman. They finished with the same conference record as did the Wildcats and therefore have their fair share of the title even if KSU did earn the league's automatic BCS bid.
It does seem ironic, however, to listen to the Big 12 talk about one true champion since the league has moved to a 10 team format without a championship game. The logic is there since every team in the league has to play every other versus the old format when a team could win the title game but could do so without having to play every team in the conference.
The logic is there and mostly correct, of course, except in the year when there are actually two true champions.
There's no word yet on whether or not Kansas State has received their rings - publicly at least - that I've seen, or whether or not they'll have imprinted "The Real Big 12 champions" at which point they'll really be something to talk about.
Until then, one true champion it is, or two, but who's counting anyway.
General College Football
Conference SpecificSaturday Down South (SEC)
Holy Turf (Big 12 and SEC)
Team Specific
Eye and Eer (Ohio State & West Virginia)
Big 12 team sites are on the team specific pages