Friday, 11 May 2012 11:39

Three Texas Games on the Longhorn Network in 2012?

Written by Jay Beck

After the initial uproar over the Longhorn Network and the perceived advantages Texas would be getting as a result of their $15 million per year deal with ESPN, things have been relatively quiet of late on the Longhorn Network front.

Texas and ESPN continue to struggle with the distrubution of the network, however, and have yet to land a major cable or satellite producer.

Granted these things often take time, but one quick way to help speed along the process is by showing more of what people really want to see - Texas football.

How about three games on the Longhorn's own network in 2012? By the sounds of it, that's exactly what Texas athletic director DeLoss Dodds has in mind.





There's little doubt that putting more football games on a channel few can view will cause some angst amongst the fan base who could then in turn put some pressure on cable and satellite providers to carry the network.

Is that enough though?

That's three games or roughly nine hours of programming spanning three Saturdays against likely the three weakest opponents on Texas' 2012 schedule. The other 362 days of the year, Texas will be in the same boat, showing the same programming that has yet to entice any outlet of substance to carry the network.

Longhorn_Network2And that's not even considering the potential hurdles Texas might have to overcome to show three games. I won't proclaim to be an expert on all the details pertaining to the Big 12's television contracts, but I've followed it close enough to at least be dangerous.

It's no secret the Big 12 allows its member institutions to do what they wish with their third-tier media rights (hence why the Longhorn Network even exists). It's my understanding that as part of the Big 12's TV contracts, each school is allowed the rights to one football game per season to be broadcast however each school chooses, on whatever third-tier distribution medium they have chosen to use. After that, any additional games would need the approval of the rest of the league.

Texas did televise two games last year after getting the necessary approvals from the Big 12 and cutting a deal with Kansas that also allowed the Jayhawks to show the game over-the-air in Kansas City and throughout the state.

Would the rest of the league agree to allow three games on the LHN? Maybe, although I'm guessing Texas would be forced to give up something in return that in some way benefits the other nine members.

Plus Fox, the second-tier rights holder, would have to choose not select two of those three games as part of its television package to show on its regional networks. Would they do this? Again maybe, but they're not going to give up one of the biggest draws in the Big 12 for free.

So the bottom line if this goes down and Texas and ESPN are able to get three games on the LHN, you're either going to have a bunch of angry Texas fans or Texas and the World Wide Leader are going to get what they want, somebody of substance carrying their network.

But as Dodds said, "the pain is worth the gain," at least in the eyes of Texas.

Last modified on Thursday, 24 May 2012 09:19
Jay Beck

Jay Beck

Follow on Twitter: @jaybeck12

For Nebraska related on twitter: @theseaofred

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Add comment

    Follow turfburner on twitter Like on facebook Subscribe to our RSS Feed

    General College Football

    Dr. Saturday

    The Matador Sports

    The Saturday Edge

    Kegs n' Eggs

    No 2 Minute Warning

    College Football Zealots

    Kody's Sports Korner

    Conference Specific

    Big East Coast Bias

    Saturday Down South (SEC)

    Holy Turf (Big 12 and SEC)

    Pacific Takes (Pac-12)

    Big 12 team sites are on the team specific pages



    Finish Line